Teaching, learning and assessment of medical ethics at the UK medical schools.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the UK undergraduate medical ethics curricula against the Institute of Medical Ethics (IME) recommendations; to identify barriers to teaching and assessment of medical ethics and to evaluate perceptions of ethics faculties on the preparation of tomorrow's doctors for clinical practice. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of the UK medical schools enquiring about content, structure and location of ethics teaching and learning; teaching and learning processes; assessment; influences over institutional approach to ethics education; barriers to teaching and assessment; perception of student engagement and perception of student preparation for clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: The lead for medical ethics at each medical school was invited to participate (n=33). RESULTS: Completed responses were received from 11/33 schools (33%). 73% (n=8) teach all IME recommended topics within their programme. 64% (n=7) do not include ethics in clinical placement learning objectives. The most frequently cited barrier to teaching was lack of time (64%, n=7), and to assessment was lack of time and suitability of assessments (27%, n=3). All faculty felt students were prepared for clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: IME recommendations are not followed in all cases, and ethics teaching is not universally well integrated into clinical placement. Barriers to assessment lead to inadequacies in this area, and there are few consequences for failing ethics assessments. As such, tomorrow's patients will be treated by doctors who are inadequately prepared for ethical decision making in clinical practice; this needs to be addressed by ethics leads with support from medical school authorities.

The ethics of hastening death during terminal weaning.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT) is under scrutiny as next-of-kin challenge medical decision-making in the courts and established end-of-life pathways are withdrawn in the face of public criticism. With persistent lobbying for medically assisted dying as the other side of the coin, and professional advice that doctors distance themselves from this activity, the fine line between defensible palliative care and hastening a death needs to be unambiguously defined, particularly with additional confounders such as transplantation initiatives. RECENT FINDINGS: The medical literature in this domain is dominated by ethical debate on euthanasia and medically assisted dying rather than defensibility within intensive care at the point of withdrawal of LSMT. SUMMARY: The process and, therefore, the timing of dying is open to manipulation by intensivists, families, other hospital physicians, courts of law and extraneous influences such as organ donation. Intensivists faced with these challenging processes need to consider some key principles to help them navigate the management of dying. They need to demonstrate transparency in order to engender trust, be responsive to the dynamically evolving needs of patient and family, avoid ambiguity, show consistency and predictability and, finally, they need to conform with society's expectations and professional standards to achieve defensibility for their actions. Adherence to these principles is likely to minimize conflict, maximize patient benefit, maintain public confidence and avoid professional jeopardy.

Resuscitation of the written word: meeting the standard for cardiac arrest documentation.

The aim of this study was to audit cardiac arrest documentation within a UK teaching hospital, survey the regional use of proformas for data collection, and consider the need for a standardised national template. A prospective audit comparing cardiac arrest documentation to General Medical Council (GMC) professional standards and the 'Utstein' fields was carried out, along with a survey of regional resuscitation officers for the use of standardised templates. The main outcome measures were the design of 'best practice' template using GMC guidelines and the 'Utstein' fields. An audit of medical notes involving a cardiac arrest call against the template was performed. There was limited documentation concerning process, events and outcome of arrest calls, as well as minimal regional use of standard templates or consensus on the essential content of medical documentation. Documentation of cardiac arrests in the Leeds Teaching Hospitals does not meet the 'Utstein' recommendations to provide enough information for audit of cardiac arrest procedure. The regional survey indicates that this problem is likely to be widespread.